SUHCX : DWS Health and Wellness Fund - Class C

SUHCX is a Sector Equity Market Healthcare with HIGH fees.

SUHCX

DWS Health and Wellness Fund - Class C

FI Score

16 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Healthcare funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SUHCX vs MHFAX

29% FI Score
  • mhfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs MINC

29% FI Score
  • minc
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AdvisorShares Newfleet Multi-Sector Income ETF

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs LZFIX

29% FI Score
  • lzfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs MCKBX

29% FI Score
  • mckbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs MELIX

29% FI Score
  • melix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Leaders Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs MGGYX

29% FI Score
  • mggyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Mirova Global Green Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs NCEAX

29% FI Score
  • nceax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Neuberger Berman Greater China Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs AFVDX

29% FI Score
  • afvdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Applied Finance Dividend Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs ABFAX

29% FI Score
  • abfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Beacon Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs NIMAX

29% FI Score
  • nimax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs ACCAX

29% FI Score
  • accax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Century Strategic Allocation: Conservative Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs NMDMX

29% FI Score
  • nmdmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Maryland Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs NMHAX

29% FI Score
  • nmhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs MSSCX

29% FI Score
  • msscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs MSSMX

29% FI Score
  • mssmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Inception Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs AFVLX

29% FI Score
  • afvlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Applied Finance Select Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs PFRCX

29% FI Score
  • pfrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs ADKSX

29% FI Score
  • adksx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Adirondack Small Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs ALBAX

29% FI Score
  • albax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Alger Growth & Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs NAIGX

29% FI Score
  • naigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Nuveen NWQ International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo