Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
9 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$SUB Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 746 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ustex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
USAA Tax Exempt Long-Term Fund
Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sbtyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Western Asset Intermediate-Term Municipals Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- smlix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hymb
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ftfmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Fidelity® New York Municipal Income Fund
Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mmhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- prinx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
T. Rowe Price Summit Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- scmbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund - Class S
Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gwmix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »