Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$STMSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 310 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- wemmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund Class AAA
Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- iysax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Ivy Small Cap Core Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- szcax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
DWS Small Cap Core Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- hooyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jgaux
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
JPMorgan Small Cap Core Fund Class R3
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- arsvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- smecx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Invesco Small Cap Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sssix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
AMG SouthernSun Small Cap Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jscax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
John Hancock II Small Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »