Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$STICX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ihfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Integrity High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gshcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- abhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Century High-Yield Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hwhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hotchkis & Wiley High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- frsax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Floating Rate Strategic Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rfrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pebcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tgwix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
TCW Emerging Markets Local Currency Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- smasx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »