Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$SSSDX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 310 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- arsvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jgaux
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
JPMorgan Small Cap Core Fund Class R3
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jscax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
John Hancock II Small Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sscox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Touchstone Small Company Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- bscvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Bernzott US Small Cap Value Fund
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- arimx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- aatsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap Fund Class S
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- mopax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
MainStay MacKay Small Cap Core Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- acrtx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
AMG Managers Silvercrest Small Cap Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »