Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
10 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$SSBWX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation Target-Date funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- lutax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Columbia U.S. Treasury Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- acitx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
American Century Inflation Adjusted Bond Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- muisx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BMO Ultra Short Tax-Free Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pgbox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
JPMorgan Core Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- vgt
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- wfilx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Wells Fargo Index Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ppvfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Funds Preservation Portfolio Class F-1
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- regl
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- rpg
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »