Diversification Rating
8 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
5 /10
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Asia Pacific ETF
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
RMB Mendon Financial Long/Short Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »
DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
TCW High Yield Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Thornburg Long/Short Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 3.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
ProFunds UltraShort Small-Cap Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map