Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
9 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$SPVU Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- saifx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
ClearBridge Large Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- rpv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lceax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Invesco Diversified Dividend Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dtn
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
WisdomTree U.S. Dividend ex-Financials Fund
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- jvltx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund Class I2
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hqiyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
The Hartford Equity Income Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- jvlix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- tlvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund Class S
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- jkf
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
iShares Morningstar Large-Cap Value ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »