Diversification Rating
7 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
10 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Wells Fargo Target 2025 Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2050 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Invesco High Income 2023 Target Term Fund
Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Hartford Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
VanEck Vectors Global Alternative Energy ETF
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc
Expenses: 2.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2025 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund
Expenses: 4.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »
Western Asset Global High Income Fund
Expenses: 2.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Columbia Strategic Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Virtus Seix High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Franklin LibertyQ Emerging Markets ETF
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
Columbia Mortgage Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
PGIM Income Builder Fund-Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
Global X Next Emerging & Frontier ETF
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2025 Adam Fortuna
Site Map