• chccx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Growth

AB Discovery Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• pxj
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Energy

Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

• fmoax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

Federated Municipal High Yield Advantage Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• pnsax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Growth

Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• dcgvx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Value

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• sigax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Western Asset Corporate Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ihta
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Invesco High Income 2024 Target Term Fund

Expenses: 2.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ipbix
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Government Bond

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

• eqnax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Value

MFS Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• emd
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund Inc

Expenses: 2.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• wfqyx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target 2045 Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• qvm
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Value

Arrow QVM Equity Factor ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• jhy
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Nuveen High Income 2020 Target Term Fund

Expenses: 2.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• tsicx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Total US Bond Market

Thornburg Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

• wbcix
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Blend

William Blair Small-Mid Cap Core Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• ppzax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2025 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• fscvx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Value

Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• qsslx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

AQR TM Small Cap Multi-Style Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• sdgcx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Growth

DWS Capital Growth Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• bzq
• ETF
• Alternative
• Inverse

ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »