Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$SMYIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- abrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aset
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund
Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- goat
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jogex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
JOHCM Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jgvax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Global Value Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mctrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MainStay Income Builder Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- kldw
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Knowledge Leaders Developed World ETF
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- arsox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aristotle/Saul Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- eadix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »