Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$SMSVX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- cpitx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Counterpoint Tactical Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- acskx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Century Short Duration Fund C Class
Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fcnbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Templeton International Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tghnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
TCW High Yield Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pcwax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Corporate Bond Fund- Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhbbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated High-Income Bond Fund Class B Shares
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eadox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pdhvx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund-Class Z
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- atmax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Strategic Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »