SLYG : SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF

SLYG is a US Stocks Market Small Growth with LOW fees.

SLYG

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF

FI Score

70 /100

Diversification Rating

3 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SLYG vs JTQAX

22% FI Score
  • jtqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

John Hancock ESG International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs HQBCX

22% FI Score
  • hqbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs LZSMX

22% FI Score
  • lzsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs LVLAX

22% FI Score
  • lvlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco Low Volatility Emerging Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs MILAX

22% FI Score
  • milax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Mirae Asset Asia Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs NITCX

22% FI Score
  • nitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aquila Narragansett Tax-Free Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs OEMAX

22% FI Score
  • oemax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs MEXX

22% FI Score
  • mexx
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily MSCI Mexico Bull 3X Shares Direxion Daily MSCI Mexico Bull 3

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs AFGGX

22% FI Score
  • afggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs PFUEX

22% FI Score
  • pfuex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Principal Finisterre Unconstrained Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs NCIGX

22% FI Score
  • ncigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Nuveen NWQ International Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs APGRX

22% FI Score
  • apgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs NFIAX

22% FI Score
  • nfiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs ARGMX

22% FI Score
  • argmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2060 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs AVACX

22% FI Score
  • avacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs OKMUX

22% FI Score
  • okmux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Oklahoma Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs ORILX

22% FI Score
  • orilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

North Square Multi Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs NWJTX

22% FI Score
  • nwjtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nationwide Loomis Short Term Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs BEECX

22% FI Score
  • beecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

BlackRock Total Emerging Markets Fund Investor C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs BGIIX

22% FI Score
  • bgiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Brandes Global Equity Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo