SLYG : SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF

SLYG is a US Stocks Market Small Growth with LOW fees.

SLYG

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF

FI Score

70 /100

Diversification Rating

3 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SLYG vs FLYRX

43% FI Score
  • flyrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Floating Rate Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs IMRFX

43% FI Score
  • imrfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Global Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs IRBO

43% FI Score
  • irbo
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF

Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs IPOAX

43% FI Score
  • ipoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Ivy Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs GCICX

43% FI Score
  • gcicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs GICCX

43% FI Score
  • giccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs GIEZX

43% FI Score
  • giezx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

GuideStone Funds International Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs TXRAX

43% FI Score
  • txrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

JPMorgan Tax Aware Real Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs UOPIX

43% FI Score
  • uopix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs JCLCX

43% FI Score
  • jclcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs JDD

43% FI Score
  • jdd
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Diversified Dividend and Income Fund

Expenses: 2.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs JHCS

43% FI Score
  • jhcs
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

John Hancock Multifactor Media and Communications ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs USBSX

43% FI Score
  • usbsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

USAA Cornerstone Moderate Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs KBWR

43% FI Score
  • kbwr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco KBW Regional Banking ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs LCFIX

43% FI Score
  • lcfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Lord Abbett California Tax Free Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs MXFIX

43% FI Score
  • mxfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay Floating Rate Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs AAINX

43% FI Score
  • aainx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Thrivent Opportunity Income Plus Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs MSIIX

43% FI Score
  • msiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

MainStay MacKay International Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs ABLAX

43% FI Score
  • ablax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2030 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SLYG vs MSQLX

43% FI Score
  • msqlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo