Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
We found 10,987 Alternatives Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Pioneer Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Neuberger Berman International Select Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
Catalyst Insider Buying Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Emerald Banking and Finance Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »
JAG Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund- Class B
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Barings Global Credit Income Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund Class T
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Olstein Strategic Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Nebraska Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Invesco Pacific Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Lazard International Equity Value Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Government Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2035 Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2026 Adam Fortuna
Site Map