• bno
• ETF
• Commodities
• Focused

United States Brent Oil Fund, LP

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

• edd
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund

Expenses: 3.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• mdhax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• pvqax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• bipix
• Mutual Fund
• Alternative
• Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

• gilfx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund C-Class

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• gnaf
• ETF
• Alternative
• Inverse

MicroSectors FANG+ Index Inverse ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

• bgx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Blackstone/GSO Long-Short Credit Income Fund

Expenses: 3.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• bgh
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund

Expenses: 3.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• tblu
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Industrials

Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

• ivh
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Ivy High Income Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 3.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ktrcx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

DWS Global Income Builder Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• gcggx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Government Bond

DWS GNMA Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ggm
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Credit Allocation Fund

Expenses: 2.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• pugcx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Putnam Global Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• svxy
• ETF
• Alternative
• Volatility

ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

• ishcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

Invesco Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• gsuax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Government Bond

Goldman Sachs U.S. Mortgages Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

• utahx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

Aquila Tax-Free Fund For Utah Class A

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• hflrx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »