SGG : iPath Series B Bloomberg Sugar Subindex Total Return ETN

SGG is a Commodities Market Focused with MODERATE fees.

SGG

iPath Series B Bloomberg Sugar Subindex Total Return ETN

FI Score

47 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Focused funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SGG vs MALAX

16% FI Score
  • malax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Mirae Asset Asia Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SGG vs RAGHX

16% FI Score
  • raghx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

AllianzGI Health Sciences Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SGG vs BRKBX

16% FI Score
  • brkbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SGG vs JETAX

16% FI Score
  • jetax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Global Equity Impact Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SGG vs CFRAX

16% FI Score
  • cfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SGG vs CHCGX

16% FI Score
  • chcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Chesapeake Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SGG vs OFSCX

16% FI Score
  • ofscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Olstein Strategic Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SGG vs DAHYX

16% FI Score
  • dahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SGG vs DAREX

16% FI Score
  • darex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Dunham Real Estate Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SGG vs DCSVX

16% FI Score
  • dcsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Dunham Small Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo