Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
3 /10
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
ACM Dynamic Opportunity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
RiverFront Dynamic Unconstrained Income ETF
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
iPath Series B Bloomberg Aluminum Subindex Total Return ETN
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
State Street International Stock Selection Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Invesco Oppenheimer International Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Guggenheim Ultra Short Duration Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Wells Fargo International Equity Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
Touchstone High Yield Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
1919 Maryland Tax-Free Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
DWS Floating Rate Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Nationwide AllianzGI International Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
Franklin Strategic Mortgage Fund Class A1
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
American Century Investments One Choice 2025 Portfolio C Class
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Global X TargetIncome Plus 2 ETF
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2025 Adam Fortuna
Site Map