SEVSX : Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund Class C

SEVSX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Value with HIGH fees.

SEVSX

Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund Class C

FI Score

23 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,182 US Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SEVSX vs HEMAX

28% FI Score
  • hemax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs IZSAX

28% FI Score
  • izsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Select Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs NIB

28% FI Score
  • nib
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Bloomberg Cocoa Subindex Total Return(SM) ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs FDIV

28% FI Score
  • fdiv
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

First Trust Strategic Income ETF

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs GTHCX

28% FI Score
  • gthcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Invesco Health Care Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs FLICX

28% FI Score
  • flicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

DWS Communications Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs GTASX

28% FI Score
  • gtasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2050 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs LBCAX

28% FI Score
  • lbcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lord Abbett Corporate Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs GSP

28% FI Score
  • gsp
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

iPath S&P GSCI Total Return Index ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs EWV

28% FI Score
  • ewv
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs TTTN

28% FI Score
  • tttn
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

TigerShares UP Fintech China-U.S. Internet Titans ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs WWEMX

28% FI Score
  • wwemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Westwood Emerging Markets Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs ETCHX

28% FI Score
  • etchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund CLASS C SHARES

Expenses: 2.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs TSMCX

28% FI Score
  • tsmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Touchstone Dynamic Global Allocation Fund C

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs IZIAX

28% FI Score
  • iziax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Invesco International Select Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs EMBIX

28% FI Score
  • embix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Blend Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs MWUSX

28% FI Score
  • mwusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Metropolitan West Ultra Short Bond Fund Class M

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs EEICX

28% FI Score
  • eeicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs ECHIX

28% FI Score
  • echix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEVSX vs ECEOX

28% FI Score
  • eceox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo