SEPCX : Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Portfolio Fund Class C

SEPCX is a Sector Equity Market Energy with HIGH fees.

SEPCX

Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Portfolio Fund Class C

FI Score

0 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Energy funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SEPCX vs FLCGX

16% FI Score
  • flcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Meeder Quantex Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs FLOTX

16% FI Score
  • flotx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Power Floating Rate Index Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs IASMX

16% FI Score
  • iasmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs ICMCX

16% FI Score
  • icmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Intrepid Disciplined Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs FRFDX

16% FI Score
  • frfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Delaware Floating Rate II Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs IDVIX

16% FI Score
  • idvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Copeland International Risk Managed Dividend Growth Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs FLSKX

16% FI Score
  • flskx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2050 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs IMSCX

16% FI Score
  • imscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

IMS Capital Value Fund

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs TNDCX

16% FI Score
  • tndcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2040 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs INTLX

16% FI Score
  • intlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Forester Discovery Fund

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs GBTFX

16% FI Score
  • gbtfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

U.S. Global Investors All American Equity Fund

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs FCEF

15% FI Score
  • fcef
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF

Expenses: 3.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs TPHAX

15% FI Score
  • tphax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs HIMAX

15% FI Score
  • himax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Hancock Horizon Mississippi Tax-Free Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs SZK

15% FI Score
  • szk
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs GMCAX

15% FI Score
  • gmcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

AllianzGI Micro Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs UJPIX

15% FI Score
  • ujpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraJapan Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs TUIFX

15% FI Score
  • tuifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Toews Unconstrained Income Fund

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs PJEAX

15% FI Score
  • pjeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

PGIM US Real Estate Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SEPCX vs PRTBX

15% FI Score
  • prtbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo