SEKCX : DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund - Class C

SEKCX is a International Stocks Market Emerging Markets with HIGH fees.

SEKCX

DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund - Class C

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Emerging Markets funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SEKCX vs MITCX

48% FI Score
  • mitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust Class C

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs MIGDX

48% FI Score
  • migdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs OCIO

48% FI Score
  • ocio
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ClearShares OCIO ETF

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs LSDRX

48% FI Score
  • lsdrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund A Class

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs JMUTX

48% FI Score
  • jmutx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Janus Henderson Multi-Sector Income Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs FYC

48% FI Score
  • fyc
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs POBAX

48% FI Score
  • pobax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs NWFAX

48% FI Score
  • nwfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs STMSX

48% FI Score
  • stmsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund Class F

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs EITTX

48% FI Score
  • eittx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Parametric TABS 10-to-20 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs BAGAX

48% FI Score
  • bagax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund Advisor Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs OARLX

48% FI Score
  • oarlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Oakmark Select Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs OPCAX

48% FI Score
  • opcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester California Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs FCITX

48% FI Score
  • fcitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Franklin Federal Intermediate-Term Tax-Free Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs TNEAX

48% FI Score
  • tneax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs JHMS

48% FI Score
  • jhms
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

John Hancock Multifactor Consumer Staples ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs NVHCX

48% FI Score
  • nvhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C2

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs MFRCX

48% FI Score
  • mfrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Research Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs NLSAX

48% FI Score
  • nlsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SEKCX vs JDGTX

48% FI Score
  • jdgtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Global Income Managed Volatility Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo