SEEKX : Crossmark Steward Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund Class A

SEEKX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend index fund with MODERATE fees.

SEEKX

Crossmark Steward Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund Class A

FI Score

46 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SEEKX vs NEARX

47% FI Score
  • nearx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEEKX vs ARBNX

47% FI Score
  • arbnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SEEKX vs ASDVX

47% FI Score
  • asdvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century Short Duration Strategic Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEEKX vs NSTRX

47% FI Score
  • nstrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Short Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEEKX vs ASHS

47% FI Score
  • ashs
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China-A Shares Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEEKX vs ASHX

47% FI Score
  • ashx
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEEKX vs OAKGX

47% FI Score
  • oakgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Oakmark Global Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEEKX vs AWP

47% FI Score
  • awp
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Aberdeen Global Premier Property

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEEKX vs OPER

47% FI Score
  • oper
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Short

ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SEEKX vs OSINX

47% FI Score
  • osinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class R

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo