SEECX : Crossmark Steward Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund Class Institutional

SEECX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend index fund with MODERATE fees.

SEECX

Crossmark Steward Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund Class Institutional

FI Score

59 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SEECX vs PUREX

42% FI Score
  • purex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

PGIM Global Real Estate Fund- Class R2

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs PUCAX

42% FI Score
  • pucax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PGIM Strategic Bond Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs PSSCX

42% FI Score
  • psscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

PIMCO StocksPLUS® Short Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs CRSAX

42% FI Score
  • crsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs DGIEX

42% FI Score
  • dgiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

BNY Mellon Global Emerging Markets Fund - Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs DHFCX

42% FI Score
  • dhfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Diamond Hill Long Short Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs DHGCX

42% FI Score
  • dhgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

BNY Mellon Global Fixed Income Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs DHICX

42% FI Score
  • dhicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Wells Fargo Strategic Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs MSGFX

42% FI Score
  • msgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs OLCAX

42% FI Score
  • olcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term California Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs MVGAX

42% FI Score
  • mvgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs OOSNX

42% FI Score
  • oosnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs MWFLX

42% FI Score
  • mwflx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Floating Rate Income Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs QLENX

42% FI Score
  • qlenx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N

Expenses: 2.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs ONLN

42% FI Score
  • onln
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

ProShares Online Retail ETF

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs NBCRX

42% FI Score
  • nbcrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Moderate Class C

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs EAGMX

42% FI Score
  • eagmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs RRFIX

42% FI Score
  • rrfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Real Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs PEJ

42% FI Score
  • pej
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs EDIIX

42% FI Score
  • ediix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo