• seupx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Growth

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• sieax
• Mutual Fund
• International Stocks
• Large Value

AIG International Dividend Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

• sopix
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Inverse

ProFunds Short NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

• szgcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• International

DWS ESG Global Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

• tefqx
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Technology

Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

• thbvx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

THB Asset Management MicroCap Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• thycx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Touchstone High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• tmnax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• tnacx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• uipix
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort Mid-Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »