SEACX : Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund Class Institutional

SEACX is a Bond Market Total US Bond Market with MODERATE fees.

SEACX

Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund Class Institutional

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Similar Funds

We found 574 Bond Total US Bond Market funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SEACX vs BMSAX

48% FI Score
  • bmsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

BlackRock Income Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs MRBCX

48% FI Score
  • mrbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MFS Total Return Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs PDVAX

48% FI Score
  • pdvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PIMCO Diversified Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs HQBTX

48% FI Score
  • hqbtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs WATAX

48% FI Score
  • watax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Western Asset Intermediate Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs LSDRX

48% FI Score
  • lsdrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund A Class

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs NSTAX

48% FI Score
  • nstax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs PCYBX

48% FI Score
  • pcybx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Pioneer Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs ANBEX

48% FI Score
  • anbex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Funds Strategic Bond Fund Class F-1

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs OSINX

47% FI Score
  • osinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class R

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs CPCFX

47% FI Score
  • cpcfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs SCPYX

47% FI Score
  • scpyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs CNDTX

47% FI Score
  • cndtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Columbia Bond Fund Class V

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs BASBX

47% FI Score
  • basbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Brown Advisory Sustainable Bond Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs FISR

47% FI Score
  • fisr
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs PLIAX

47% FI Score
  • pliax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Pacific Funds Core Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs FFIU

47% FI Score
  • ffiu
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Fieldstone UVA Unconstrained Medium-Term Fixed Income ETF

Expenses: 0.51% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs VKMGX

47% FI Score
  • vkmgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Quality Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs UTBPX

47% FI Score
  • utbpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

UBS Total Return Bond Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEACX vs EXCRX

47% FI Score
  • excrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Manning & Napier Core Bond Series Class S

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo