Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$SDAG Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pkcbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund Advisor Class
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mgilx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Corporate Bond Portfolio Class L
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- esiyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo International Bond Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mhobx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS Global High Yield Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- thycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Touchstone High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- aubax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco World Bond Factor Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dnhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phchx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pgglx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Global Income Trust Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »