SCSSX : Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund Class A Shares

SCSSX is a Bond Market Total US Bond Market with HIGH fees.

SCSSX

Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund Class A Shares

FI Score

29 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Total US Bond Market funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SCSSX vs RACLX

15% FI Score
  • raclx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Conductor Global Equity Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs RYIHX

15% FI Score
  • ryihx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse High Yield Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs WEBCX

15% FI Score
  • webcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

TETON Westwood Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs VHFIX

15% FI Score
  • vhfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Virtus Herzfeld Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs QUAGX

15% FI Score
  • quagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Quaker Impact Growth Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs SBM

15% FI Score
  • sbm
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short Basic Materials

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs RIVSX

15% FI Score
  • rivsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

River Oak Discovery Fund

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs UVPIX

15% FI Score
  • uvpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort Emerging Market Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs SCC

15% FI Score
  • scc
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs RPGIX

15% FI Score
  • rpgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

T. Rowe Price Global Industrials Fund

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs PGLOX

15% FI Score
  • pglox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

T. Rowe Price Global Consumer Fund

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs IDVGX

15% FI Score
  • idvgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Copeland International Risk Managed Dividend Growth Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs MSFEX

15% FI Score
  • msfex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Frontier Markets Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 2.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs LPHCX

15% FI Score
  • lphcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2045 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs PFVCX

15% FI Score
  • pfvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Pacific Funds Large-Cap Value Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs QAGIX

15% FI Score
  • qagix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Quaker Impact Growth Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs TRFAX

15% FI Score
  • trfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Patriot Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs MINBX

15% FI Score
  • minbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Madison International Stock Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs NGLCX

15% FI Score
  • nglcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Neuberger Berman Global Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs RYLVX

15% FI Score
  • rylvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo