SCSSX : Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund Class A Shares

SCSSX is a Bond Market Total US Bond Market with HIGH fees.

SCSSX

Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund Class A Shares

FI Score

29 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Total US Bond Market funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SCSSX vs LCISX

36% FI Score
  • lcisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs MTYKX

36% FI Score
  • mtykx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2050 Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs TRACX

36% FI Score
  • tracx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

PGIM QMA Small-Cap Value Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs TEGAX

36% FI Score
  • tegax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Touchstone Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs PMDDX

36% FI Score
  • pmddx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Principal Small-MidCap Dividend Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs GSRAX

36% FI Score
  • gsrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs NLAGX

36% FI Score
  • nlagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Nuveen Large Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs HEWU

36% FI Score
  • hewu
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI United Kingdom ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs TWEBX

36% FI Score
  • twebx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Tweedy, Browne Value Fund

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs OEGNX

36% FI Score
  • oegnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund R

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs BUFBX

35% FI Score
  • bufbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Buffalo Flexible Income Fund

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs DBB

35% FI Score
  • dbb
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

Invesco DB Base Metals Fund

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs DRIP

35% FI Score
  • drip
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bear 2X Shares

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs DRV

35% FI Score
  • drv
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily MSCI Real Estate Bear 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs DWAT

35% FI Score
  • dwat
  • ETF
  • Other
  • Tactical Allocation

Arrow DWA Tactical ETF

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Tactical Allocation Other fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs EAALX

35% FI Score
  • eaalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs EAFGX

35% FI Score
  • eafgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs EALCX

35% FI Score
  • ealcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Eaton Vance Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs ECEIX

35% FI Score
  • eceix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCSSX vs ECTMX

35% FI Score
  • ectmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Eaton Vance Dividend Builder Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo