SCO : ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil

SCO is a Alternative Market Inverse with HIGH fees.

SCO

ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil

FI Score

43 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SCO vs OURAX

16% FI Score
  • ourax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Mission-Auour Risk-Managed Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs MALAX

16% FI Score
  • malax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Mirae Asset Asia Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs RAGHX

16% FI Score
  • raghx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

AllianzGI Health Sciences Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs BRKBX

16% FI Score
  • brkbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs JETAX

16% FI Score
  • jetax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Global Equity Impact Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs CFRAX

16% FI Score
  • cfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs CHCGX

16% FI Score
  • chcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Chesapeake Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs OFSCX

16% FI Score
  • ofscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Olstein Strategic Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs DAHYX

16% FI Score
  • dahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs DAREX

16% FI Score
  • darex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Dunham Real Estate Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo