SCIX : Global X Scientific Beta Asia ex-Japan ETF

SCIX is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with LOW fees.

SCIX

Global X Scientific Beta Asia ex-Japan ETF

FI Score

44 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SCIX vs RYCQX

24% FI Score
  • rycqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs SUVBX

24% FI Score
  • suvbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM QMA Large-Cap Value Fund- Class B

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs TSLCX

24% FI Score
  • tslcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Transamerica Small Cap Value C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs SLCGX

24% FI Score
  • slcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs SSCDX

24% FI Score
  • sscdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs SSVSX

24% FI Score
  • ssvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Victory Special Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs YXI

24% FI Score
  • yxi
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short FTSE China 50

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs WFLAX

24% FI Score
  • wflax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target 2020 Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs POACX

24% FI Score
  • poacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs RFXIX

24% FI Score
  • rfxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Rational Special Situations Income Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo