Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$SCIX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- egwax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Wells Fargo Fundamental Small Cap Growth Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- htayx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Highland Total Return Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- gtahx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Goldman Sachs Target Date Retirement Portfolio A Shares
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- creax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- gaucx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Utilities
Gabelli Utilities Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »
- cwsgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- adavx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aberdeen Dynamic Dividend Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hipcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Hartford Inflation Plus Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- arffx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Ariel Focus Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »