Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
9 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$SCHD Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- balvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
BMO Large-Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dhlcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- edow
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bpavx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fstkx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Federated MDT Large Cap Value Fund Service Shares
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- twadx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Century Value Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pqirx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Pioneer Equity Income Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- suvzx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
PGIM QMA Large-Cap Value Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mdfsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series Class S
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »