SCHA : Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF

SCHA is a US Stocks Market Small Blend with LOW fees.

SCHA

Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF

FI Score

88 /100

Diversification Rating

7 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SCHA vs MCILX

35% FI Score
  • mcilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

BlackRock International Fund of BlackRock Series, Inc.Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs AUNCX

35% FI Score
  • auncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs RFUN

35% FI Score
  • rfun
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

RiverFront Dynamic Unconstrained Income ETF

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs EVCGX

35% FI Score
  • evcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs LMMDX

35% FI Score
  • lmmdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

1919 Maryland Tax-Free Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs BESIX

35% FI Score
  • besix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs FIRNX

35% FI Score
  • firnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Simplicity RMD Income Fund

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs ARWCX

35% FI Score
  • arwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2025 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs FRGOX

35% FI Score
  • frgox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs ARKQ

35% FI Score
  • arkq
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs ARGNX

35% FI Score
  • argnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2060 Portfolio I Class

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs ARDMX

35% FI Score
  • ardmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2040 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs GDMIX

35% FI Score
  • gdmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs ARANX

35% FI Score
  • aranx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Horizon Active Risk Assist® Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs JJU

35% FI Score
  • jju
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Aluminum Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs AOTAX

35% FI Score
  • aotax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AllianzGI Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs THYYX

35% FI Score
  • thyyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Touchstone High Yield Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs ANHIX

35% FI Score
  • anhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs AMHYX

35% FI Score
  • amhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCHA vs MWCBX

35% FI Score
  • mwcbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Corporate Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo