Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$SCFAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- sghcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Global High Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fldkx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Limited Duration Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwcsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Corporate Bond Fund Class M
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hldyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sahyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Global High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- msicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay Unconstrained Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- semdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pagpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Global Bond Opportunities Fund (Unhedged) Class A
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pggix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Global Income Trust Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nnhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nicholas High Income Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxgyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Global High Yield Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- masbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay Unconstrained Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- aflix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sasfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AIG Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rsfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- irbax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ivy Pictet Targeted Return Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emdzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund-Class Z
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dnfrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ekhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »