Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
AQR TM Emerging Multi-Style Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
Davis Opportunity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Navigator Tactical Fixed Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
American Century Income and Growth Fund C Class
Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
John Hancock California Tax Free Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Columbia Seligman Communications and Information Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
Aberdeen Emerging Markets Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Aristotle Value Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
BNY Mellon Global Emerging Markets Fund - Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
Janus Henderson High-Yield Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Metropolitan West Floating Rate Income Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Auxier Focus Fund Institutional
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term California Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
First Trust Developed International Equity Select ETF
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2026 Adam Fortuna
Site Map