Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$SBFAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,815 Sector Equity Financial Services funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pass
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
Direxion Daily Cnsmr Discret Bear 3XShrs
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- pudcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pwdcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Power Dividend Index Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bxeax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Emerging Markets Debt Blended Total Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- casax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Asia/Pacific Stock
Columbia Pacific/Asia Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- caxcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mfmpx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Frontier Markets Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- chusx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Alger Global Focus Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »