SAMBX : Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund Class I

SAMBX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with MODERATE fees.

SAMBX

Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund Class I

FI Score

59 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SAMBX vs LPVIX

15% FI Score
  • lpvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2055 Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs HOPCX

15% FI Score
  • hopcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

HSBC Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs LPHCX

15% FI Score
  • lphcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2045 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs EFCAX

15% FI Score
  • efcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Emerald Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs GSYAX

15% FI Score
  • gsyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Goldman Sachs Imprint Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs HDSVX

15% FI Score
  • hdsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs ICEEX

15% FI Score
  • iceex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

ICON Energy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs IDVGX

15% FI Score
  • idvgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Copeland International Risk Managed Dividend Growth Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs ICBAX

15% FI Score
  • icbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

ICON Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs ICFSX

15% FI Score
  • icfsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

ICON Financial Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs ACCOX

15% FI Score
  • accox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

American Century International Value Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs LSRIX

15% FI Score
  • lsrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Emerald Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs ISCCX

15% FI Score
  • isccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Federated International Small-Mid Company Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs JMNAX

15% FI Score
  • jmnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

JPMorgan Research Market Neutral Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs PGJAX

15% FI Score
  • pgjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs GUMCX

15% FI Score
  • gumcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Guggenheim Market Neutral Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs HDCEX

15% FI Score
  • hdcex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Rational Equity Armor Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs HLFNX

15% FI Score
  • hlfnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs MMECX

15% FI Score
  • mmecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Victory Integrity Discovery Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SAMBX vs NUICX

15% FI Score
  • nuicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nuveen Santa Barbara International Dividend Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo