SACAX : Principal Strategic Asset Management Strategic Growth Fund Class A

SACAX is a Allocation Market All-In-One with MODERATE fees.

SACAX

Principal Strategic Asset Management Strategic Growth Fund Class A

FI Score

61 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SACAX vs GVIP

48% FI Score
  • gvip
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs MDHIX

48% FI Score
  • mdhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs MDSPX

48% FI Score
  • mdspx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

BlackRock Advantage U.S. Total Market Fund, Inc.Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs MPAIX

48% FI Score
  • mpaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Advantage Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs NLSAX

48% FI Score
  • nlsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs MFRCX

48% FI Score
  • mfrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Research Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs HDVAX

48% FI Score
  • hdvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Hartford International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs MIGDX

48% FI Score
  • migdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs MITCX

48% FI Score
  • mitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust Class C

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs ASVIX

48% FI Score
  • asvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

American Century Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs TGVAX

48% FI Score
  • tgvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Thornburg International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs HFMRX

48% FI Score
  • hfmrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

The Hartford MidCap Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs MNA

48% FI Score
  • mna
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs HMVYX

48% FI Score
  • hmvyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs MRBCX

48% FI Score
  • mrbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MFS Total Return Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs MRICX

48% FI Score
  • mricx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Research International Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs MRIBX

48% FI Score
  • mribx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Research International Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs PSCHX

48% FI Score
  • pschx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

PGIM Jennison Small Company Fund- Class R2

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs EWJV

48% FI Score
  • ewjv
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF

Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SACAX vs PRISX

48% FI Score
  • prisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo