RYSHX : Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class H

RYSHX is a Alternatives Market Inverse with HIGH fees.

RYSHX

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class H

FI Score

27 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,987 Alternatives Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RYSHX vs OUSM

42% FI Score
  • ousm
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs LCGNX

42% FI Score
  • lcgnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs VARIX

42% FI Score
  • varix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Virtus Rampart Sector Trend Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs VIMCX

42% FI Score
  • vimcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs OCRDX

42% FI Score
  • ocrdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Rising Dividends Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs MSCFX

42% FI Score
  • mscfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs NDVCX

42% FI Score
  • ndvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs NDVBX

42% FI Score
  • ndvbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs ODICX

42% FI Score
  • odicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer Discovery Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs OEUR

42% FI Score
  • oeur
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

O’Shares Europe Quality Dividend ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs MSACX

42% FI Score
  • msacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs MSGFX

42% FI Score
  • msgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs OLCAX

42% FI Score
  • olcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term California Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs MVGAX

42% FI Score
  • mvgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs OOSNX

42% FI Score
  • oosnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs MWFLX

42% FI Score
  • mwflx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Floating Rate Income Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs ONLN

42% FI Score
  • onln
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

ProShares Online Retail ETF

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs ARSQX

42% FI Score
  • arsqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Aristotle Value Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs AAAAX

42% FI Score
  • aaaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs ACGCX

42% FI Score
  • acgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

American Century Income and Growth Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo