RYSHX : Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class H

RYSHX is a Alternatives Market Inverse with HIGH fees.

RYSHX

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class H

FI Score

27 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,987 Alternatives Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RYSHX vs INDZX

48% FI Score
  • indzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Columbia Large Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs ISCF

48% FI Score
  • iscf
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Intl Small-Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs ISIAX

48% FI Score
  • isiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Voya Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs NYVCX

48% FI Score
  • nyvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Davis New York Venture Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs IUSS

48% FI Score
  • iuss
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Invesco RAFI Strategic US Small Company ETF

Expenses: 0.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs JBLBX

48% FI Score
  • jblbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class B

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs JCLBX

48% FI Score
  • jclbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs JDGTX

48% FI Score
  • jdgtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Global Income Managed Volatility Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs JHMS

48% FI Score
  • jhms
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

John Hancock Multifactor Consumer Staples ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs JMUTX

48% FI Score
  • jmutx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Janus Henderson Multi-Sector Income Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs JOF

48% FI Score
  • jof
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Japan Smaller Capitalization Fund

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs LCGRX

48% FI Score
  • lcgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs LEISX

48% FI Score
  • leisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Federated Equity Income Fund, Inc. Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs LGRCX

48% FI Score
  • lgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs SHYL

48% FI Score
  • shyl
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs POBAX

48% FI Score
  • pobax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs TWMIX

48% FI Score
  • twmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

American Century Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs PRRWX

48% FI Score
  • prrwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2035 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs PRUAX

48% FI Score
  • pruax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

PGIM Jennison Utility Fund- Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs RWGV

48% FI Score
  • rwgv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Direxion Russell 1000 Growth Over Value ETF

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo