RYSHX : Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class H

RYSHX is a Alternatives Market Inverse with HIGH fees.

RYSHX

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class H

FI Score

27 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,987 Alternatives Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RYSHX vs SBFIX

50% FI Score
  • sbfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Federated Global Allocation Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs MNOAX

50% FI Score
  • mnoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs TFFIX

49% FI Score
  • tffix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Touchstone Focused Fund Institutional

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs TNDAX

49% FI Score
  • tndax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2040 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs TSVAX

49% FI Score
  • tsvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

PGIM QMA Small-Cap Value Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs UBG

49% FI Score
  • ubg
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

UBS ETRACS CMCI Gold Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs UGSCX

49% FI Score
  • ugscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

American Funds U.S. Government Securities Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs USTB

49% FI Score
  • ustb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

VictoryShares USAA Core Short-Term Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs VIISX

49% FI Score
  • viisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Virtus KAR International Small-Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs WFPAX

49% FI Score
  • wfpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Wells Fargo Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs WFPDX

49% FI Score
  • wfpdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Wells Fargo Premier Large Company Growth Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs WINIX

49% FI Score
  • winix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Wilmington International Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs WOOD

49% FI Score
  • wood
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs XCEM

49% FI Score
  • xcem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF

Expenses: 0.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs EQL

49% FI Score
  • eql
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF

Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs ETV

49% FI Score
  • etv
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Options-based

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs EVLMC

49% FI Score
  • evlmc
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond NextShares

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs RZG

49% FI Score
  • rzg
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs EWZS

49% FI Score
  • ewzs
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Latin America Stock

iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Latin America Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs FAFJX

49% FI Score
  • fafjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo