RYSGX : Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund Class A

RYSGX is a US Stocks Market Small Growth with HIGH fees.

RYSGX

Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund Class A

FI Score

12 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RYSGX vs BMPCX

22% FI Score
  • bmpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

BlackRock US Mortgage Portfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs MECEX

22% FI Score
  • mecex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs OCMPX

22% FI Score
  • ocmpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs CCBAX

22% FI Score
  • ccbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

City National Rochdale Corporate Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs CGAVX

22% FI Score
  • cgavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Causeway Global Absolute Return Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs CIGCX

22% FI Score
  • cigcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Calamos International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs DNCGX

22% FI Score
  • dncgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Dunham Corporate/Government Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs CRECX

22% FI Score
  • crecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs CROC

22% FI Score
  • croc
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Australian Dollar

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs MSMTX

22% FI Score
  • msmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Mortgage Securities Trust Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs PEMBX

22% FI Score
  • pembx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs FTTCX

22% FI Score
  • fttcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2025 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs CVISX

22% FI Score
  • cvisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Causeway International Small Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs CVLCX

22% FI Score
  • cvlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Growth & Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs DPFAX

22% FI Score
  • dpfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs RAANX

22% FI Score
  • raanx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Altegris/AACA Opportunistic Real Estate Fund N

Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs RRGCX

22% FI Score
  • rrgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs DURAX

22% FI Score
  • durax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

DWS ESG International Core Equity Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs RGNCX

22% FI Score
  • rgncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Victory Global Natural Resources Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYSGX vs EPDPX

21% FI Score
  • epdpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo