Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$RYOCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pnobx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tgusx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
TCW New America Premier Equities Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- sopvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Opportunity Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- stafx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- aaagx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hgocx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
The Hartford Growth Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- cpocx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Morgan Stanley Insight Fund Class L
Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- alafx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Alger Focus Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- fbgx
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »