Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
5 /10
We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
EuroPac International Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class P
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
Virtus Seix Corporate Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Putnam Focused Equity Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Putnam Focused Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Putnam International Value Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
Thrivent Multidimensional Income Fund Class S
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
PGIM California Muni Income Fund-Class C
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map