Diversification Rating
10 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$RYH Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,815 Sector Equity Healthcare funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- lphcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2045 Fund Investor C Shares
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- gsyax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Goldman Sachs Imprint Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- hdsvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- hldax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- idvgx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Copeland International Risk Managed Dividend Growth Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- ddfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- accox
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
American Century International Value Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- lsrix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Emerald Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »