• lilax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Index 2025 Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.36% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• pjfzx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Growth

PGIM Jennison Growth Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• dfpax
• Mutual Fund
• International Stocks
• Large Blend

BNY Mellon Diversified International Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

• dgrw
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund

Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• dhs
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Value

WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Fund

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• ibmk
• ETF
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

iShares iBonds Dec 2022 Term Muni Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• fatkx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® 2020 Fund Class K6

Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• fdtkx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® 2025 Fund Class K6

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• gsew
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• avus
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »