RYCDX : Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy Fund Class C

RYCDX is a Alternative Market Inverse with HIGH fees.

RYCDX

Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy Fund Class C

FI Score

16 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RYCDX vs IEYAX

34% FI Score
  • ieyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Ivy Energy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs BGSCX

34% FI Score
  • bgscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs GEMZX

34% FI Score
  • gemzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

GuideStone Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs RSSCX

34% FI Score
  • rsscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Global Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs NBMIX

34% FI Score
  • nbmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs KFYP

34% FI Score
  • kfyp
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

KraneShares CICC China Leaders 100 Index ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs LMRNX

34% FI Score
  • lmrnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs ASICX

34% FI Score
  • asicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs HDAVX

34% FI Score
  • hdavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Dividend & Income Builder Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs AROAX

34% FI Score
  • aroax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2045 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs FSZ

34% FI Score
  • fsz
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs BISAX

34% FI Score
  • bisax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs CHMCX

34% FI Score
  • chmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia High Yield Municipal Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs BIOPX

34% FI Score
  • biopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Baron Opportunity Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs SBHSX

34% FI Score
  • sbhsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Segall Bryant & Hamill International Small Cap Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs EMCB

34% FI Score
  • emcb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs EEMCX

34% FI Score
  • eemcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Columbia Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs LGWIX

34% FI Score
  • lgwix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Ladenburg Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs MSKLX

34% FI Score
  • msklx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYCDX vs VLIFX

34% FI Score
  • vlifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo