RYARX : Rydex Inverse S&P 500® Strategy Fund Class A

RYARX is a Alternatives Market Inverse with MODERATE fees.

RYARX

Rydex Inverse S&P 500® Strategy Fund Class A

FI Score

43 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,987 Alternatives Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RYARX vs IRFCX

26% FI Score
  • irfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs PIPTX

26% FI Score
  • piptx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs IIBCX

26% FI Score
  • iibcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco International Core Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs SLSSX

26% FI Score
  • slssx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Selected International Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs WASIX

26% FI Score
  • wasix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Seven Canyons Strategic Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs TFGPX

26% FI Score
  • tfgpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Beacon TwentyFour Strategic Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs WSMVX

26% FI Score
  • wsmvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Wilshire Small Company Value Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs STCIX

26% FI Score
  • stcix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs VIESX

26% FI Score
  • viesx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Virtus KAR Emerging Markets Small-Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs TVIDX

26% FI Score
  • tvidx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Defensive Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs SIHPX

26% FI Score
  • sihpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guggenheim High Yield Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs SSIAX

26% FI Score
  • ssiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs USMAX

26% FI Score
  • usmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

AlphaSimplex Tactical U.S. Market Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs KMDVX

26% FI Score
  • kmdvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Keeley Mid Cap Dividend Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs TFSAX

25% FI Score
  • tfsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Beacon TwentyFour Strategic Income Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs WFSTX

25% FI Score
  • wfstx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Wells Fargo Specialized Technology Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs RFAP

25% FI Score
  • rfap
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Asia Pacific ETF

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs WVCCX

25% FI Score
  • wvccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Aberdeen International Small Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs SILAX

25% FI Score
  • silax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Wells Fargo Diversified International Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYARX vs RYSOX

25% FI Score
  • rysox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Rydex S&P 500 Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo