Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$RYALX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,987 Alternatives Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- bspsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Service Shares
Expenses: 0.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- fuamx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Fidelity® Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund
Expenses: 0.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- futbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund
Expenses: 0.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ief
- ETF
- Bond
- Government Bond
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sub
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vemax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
Expenses: 0.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- vftax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund Admiral
Expenses: 0.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- schr
- ETF
- Bond
- Government Bond
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Expenses: 0.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- shy
- ETF
- Bond
- Government Bond
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »