RWM : ProShares Short Russell2000

RWM is a Alternative Market Inverse with HIGH fees.

RWM

ProShares Short Russell2000

FI Score

47 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RWM vs DGSMX

17% FI Score
  • dgsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

DGHM V2000 SmallCap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs DHTRX

17% FI Score
  • dhtrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Centre Active U.S. Treasury Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs CUSRX

17% FI Score
  • cusrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Cullen Small Cap Value Fund Class Retail Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs DROCX

17% FI Score
  • drocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Diamond Hill Research Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs PFSEX

17% FI Score
  • pfsex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs TLGCX

17% FI Score
  • tlgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs ECOLX

17% FI Score
  • ecolx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Riverbridge Eco Leaders® Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs RSINX

17% FI Score
  • rsinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Victory RS Investors Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs EIXIX

17% FI Score
  • eixix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs SAJCX

17% FI Score
  • sajcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

AIG Japan Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs ETABX

17% FI Score
  • etabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eventide Limited-Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs ETCDX

17% FI Score
  • etcdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs ETCMX

17% FI Score
  • etcmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs PGYCX

17% FI Score
  • pgycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Global High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs OVECX

17% FI Score
  • ovecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Sterling Capital Mid Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs GCLLX

16% FI Score
  • gcllx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Flexible Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs GLNBX

16% FI Score
  • glnbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs GLNCX

16% FI Score
  • glncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs JMNSX

16% FI Score
  • jmnsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

JPMorgan Research Market Neutral Fund Class I

Expenses: 3.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs VGEIX

16% FI Score
  • vgeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Virtus Vontobel Greater European Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo